Business Economics ®- October 2001
|
To download the entire
October issue in one large file right click the
link below, and choose Save to Disk. (Due to the
large file size, you will have best results downloading
the file and saving it, rather than trying to view
it online.)
Articles can also
be viewed individually online or downloaded. All
articles are in Adobe Acrobat format (pdf). To
get a free Adobe Acrobat reader, please see the
Adobe site.
Selected articles, as noted, are available to the
public.
Download the October issue in one file
(PDF, 989
K)
(Note: To save the
entire issue, or any of the individual articles,
directly to disk so that you can view them later,
right-click on its link. Then select "Save
Target As" in Internet Explorer, and "Save
Link As" in Netscape Navigator, in the pop-up
menu.)
Most articles are
available for members only. Non-members can purchase
articles at the NABE
Document Store online.
|
|
Front
Matter Masthead, Board of Editors, From the Editor
(PDF, 124
K) |
|
Henry Kaufman
|
What Would Adam Smith Say Now?
The breadth and depth of Adam Smiths
thought over 200 years ago still provide powerful
lessons today. Were he present, he would applaud
much of what has transpired in the organization
of economic life, particularly in the U.S.
economy and its thrust toward individual achievement
and relatively free markets for goods and services,
capital, and labor. However, he would also
be
deeply troubled by recent trends toward consolidation,
particularly in the financial sector, and the
emergence of too-big-to-fail as
an argument for government to weaken the discipline
of markets.
(PDF, 61
K)
|
|
Charles Steindel and Kevin J. Stiroh
|
Productivity: What Is It, and Why Do
We Care About It?
Economists, business analysts, and
policymakers have all
focused considerable attention on U.S. productivity
growth in recent years. This paper presents
a broad overview of productivityboth
labor and total factorand discusses why
it is such an important topic. We begin with
the official U.S. productivity statistics prepared
by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and
discuss several stylized facts. We show how
productivity relates to criti-cally important
variables like long-run growth, living standards,
and inflation. We then describe the proximate
factors that determine labor productivity using
a standard growth accounting framework. Finally,
we outline a series of unresolved productivity
issues that have direct implications for the
future of the U.S. economy.
(PDF,
122K)
|
|
Ernest Goss
|
The Internets Contribution to
U.S. Productivity Growth
How much has the Internet contributed
to recent productivity performance in the U.S.
economy? While Oliner and Sichel (2000), using
back of the envelope calculations,
found that it had no impact, Litan and Rivlin
(2001), using judgmental estimates,
found the Internets contribution to productivity
growth to be 0.2-0.4 percent per year over
the last half of the 1990s. This study examines
the impact of actual Internet usage byindustry
for 1997, 1998, and 1999 by using pooled times-series
and cross-section data in a production function
framework. Its results suggest that job-related
Internet usage had a positive and statistically
significant impact on productivity growth of
roughly 0.25 percent per year. Furthermore,
the productivity enhancing power of the Internet
is found to differ according to the information
technology (IT) intensity of the industry.
For those industries characterized by less
intensive use of IT, it is estimated that Internet
usage added 0.52 percent annually to productivity
growth. For IT intensive industries, it contributed
less than 0.04 percent. Going forward, it is
likely that the Internet will continue to enhance
U.S. productivity growth, especially among
non-IT intensive industries.
(PDF,
95 K)
|
|
Laurence H. Meyer
|
Comparative Central Banking and the
Politics of Monetary Policy
All central banks must steer a careful course
between independence and accountability. There
are four important mechanisms: legislative
mandate, instrument independence, informal
interactions with government, and government
procedures to foster accountability. Inherent
conflict between independence and accountability
makes balance a crucial component of successful
central banking. If this balance is not struck
successfully and there is not a shared understanding
of the roles of government and the central
bank, it is unlikely that stabilization policy
will be successful. Transparency is also important
for credibility and accountability.
(PDF, 57K)
|
|
Michael Moskow
|
Comments on International Perspectives
on the Process of Monetary Policy Formulation
The deliberations of central banks can be compared
to those of judicial panels. Both have traditionally
deliberated in private. In democracies, the
judiciary issues detailed, after-the-fact reasoning
behind its decisions. However, until recently,
the central bank said little, if anything about
its monetary policy actions. What are the benefits
and costs of the new trend toward transparency?
Also, under what circumstances is it preferable
to have a narrowly focused mandate for monetary
policy rather than one that requires the reconciliation
of competing objectives?
(PDF, 30
K)
|
|
Charles Freedman
|
Monetary Policy Formulation: The Process
in Canada
Experience in Canada and elsewhere has demonstrated
that inflation targeting is a clear and effective
way of achieving low inflation. As a result,
financial, product, and labor markets have
adjusted their longer-term inflation expectations
and have reduced risk premiums that compensate
for inflation uncertainty. Moreover, inflation
targets are easily communicated, thereby enhancing
credibility and transparency, which are increasingly
recognized as desirable elements of the monetary
policy process. Effective, timely communication
of monetary policy is also important in achieving
transparency. Specific actions of the Bank
of Canada to implement these principles are
presented and discussed.
(PDF, 50
K)
|
|
Christian Noyer
|
Monetary Policy Formulation in the Euro
Area
The primary objective and unambiguous mandate
of the European Central Bank (ECB) is price
stability in the euro area. The ECB’s objective
is to provide a stable environment that is
supportive of long-term growth rather than
short-term fine tuning. Policy is made by its
Governing Council and implemented by its Executive
Board, which instructs national banks on actions
to be taken. Given the uncertainty of the future
economic environment, especially with the introduction
of the euro as a common currency, it is important
to rely on a variety of models and approaches
and on judgemental appraisal. One pillar of
this approach is a focus on the relationship
of inflation to monetary aggregates. The second
is more general analysis of macroeconomic conditions.
Combining these two pillars of monetary policy
has been successful in maintaining long-term
interest rates consistent with price stability.
(PDF, 42
K)
|
|
Sushil B. Wadhwani
|
Some Reflections on the Bank of Englands
Monetary Policy Committee
The new monetary policy framework in the UK
has made an encouraging start, as inflation
expectations have fallen to around target.
This does not appear to have come at the cost
of growth, as the unemployment rate has continued
to fall, and output growth has been slightly
above its average rate. A critical feature
of our framework is that it specifies a symmetric
target. If we persistently undershoot the target,
it could eventually damage our credibility.
Therefore, it will remain important to respond
to the possible changes in the structural relationships
that underlie our forecasting processes. While
UK monetary policy is more transparent than
in many other countries, our interest rate
decisions appear to have surprised the markets
more than those of other central banks. However,
these empirical results may be distorted, because,
in the early years of the Monetary Policy Committee,
the markets were trying to learn how we would
react to developments in the economy. Over
a more recent period, the average market surprise
associated with our decisions is broadly in
line with other major central banks.
(PDF, 100
K)
|
|
Robert V. DiClemente
|
Monetary Policy and Financial Markets:
Two Hands Clapping
Clear and effective communication between central
bankers and financial markets helps to establish
and reinforce credibility of policy. During
the Greenspan era, the Fed has made major strides
in effective communication and has largely
avoided the damaging consequences of markets
misinterpreting Fed policy. By the same token,
the Fed’s careful attention to signals coming
from markets has helped it avoid policy mistakes.
It seems reasonable to say that the success
of the Fed of the Greenspan era has been as
much due to its ability to referee markets
as to control them.
(PDF, 49
K)
|
|
Michael McKee
|
Central Banks and the Financial Press
The financial press is playing a critical and
growing role in communicating central bank
policy. The result has been more effective
central bank policy and better risk management
in financial markets. A critical role of the
financial press is to make monetary policy
more transparent, enhanced by the increased
willingness of many central banks to be more
open in their communication. There are, however,
areas in which both the financial press and
the central banks can be even more effective
in communication of monetary policy.
(PDF, 47
K)
|
|
|
|
Forum on Emerging Issues
|
|
William F. Ford
|
Economic Impacts of the World Trade
Center and Pentagon Attacks
Business economists have new responsibilities
and opportunities to help their organizations
cope.
(PDF, 43
K)
|
|
Book Reviews
|
|
|
J. Fred Weston
|
Michael J. Brennan, Empirical Corporate
Finance (Volumes I, II, III and IV)
(PDF, 44 K)
Available to public
|
|
Order these books at the NABE
Bookstore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|