Restoring Trust After the Bubble

Lawmakers are Addressing Only One Side of the Problem

By John Plender

John Plender is a columnist for the Financial Times in London and a former financial editor of The Economist. He served on the steering group of the UK government’s Company Law Review and has consulted on corporate governance for the International Finance Corporation. His latest book, which explores the themes in the article that follows, is Going Off the Rails: Global Capital and the Crisis of Legitimacy, published by John Wiley.

The American model of capitalism went through a subtle metamorphosis during the stock market bubble of the 1990s. The growth of the stock option culture in the boardroom led to a shift in the balance of power in favour of managers at the expense of shareholders and the system acquired many of the characteristics of the “insider” models of continental Europe and Japan. At the same time the structure of boardroom incentives encouraged excessive risk-taking and a narrowly financial view of corporate performance. In their efforts to reregulate after the rash of corporate scandals and governance mishaps, lawmakers have failed to address the damage caused by distorted incentives, including pervasive rewards for failure. At a more fundamental level, it will be difficult to restore legitimacy in capital markets because the governance framework is ill-matched to an economy in which human capital increasingly holds the key to competitive advantage.

 

Read the article: HTML | PDF