Lawmakers are Addressing Only One Side of the Problem
By John Plender
John Plender is a columnist for
the Financial Times in London
and a former financial editor
of The Economist. He served on
the steering group of the UK
government’s Company Law
Review and has consulted on
corporate governance for the
International Finance Corporation. His latest book, which explores the themes
in the article that follows, is Going Off the Rails: Global
Capital and the Crisis of Legitimacy, published
by John Wiley.
The American model of capitalism went through a subtle
metamorphosis during the stock market bubble of the
1990s. The growth of the stock option culture in the
boardroom led to a shift in the balance of power in
favour of managers at the expense of shareholders and
the system acquired many of the characteristics of the
“insider” models of continental Europe and Japan. At
the same time the structure of boardroom incentives
encouraged excessive risk-taking and a narrowly financial
view of corporate performance. In their efforts to reregulate
after the rash of corporate scandals and governance
mishaps, lawmakers have failed to address the
damage caused by distorted incentives, including pervasive
rewards for failure. At a more fundamental level, it
will be difficult to restore legitimacy in capital markets because the governance framework is ill-matched to an
economy in which human capital increasingly holds the
key to competitive advantage.