|
Home From the Editor Harvey Rosenblum: Understanding
Inflation Edward J Kane: What Economic Principles
Should Policymakers in Other Countries Have Learned About the S &
L Mess? George G. Kaufman: The Use of Economic
Analysis to Affect Public Economic Policy George J Benston: How Much Regulation
of Financial Services Do We Really Need? John B. Taylor: Strengthening the Global
Economy Arturo C. Porzecanski: A Critique
of Sovereign Bankruptcy Initiatives Albert E. DePrince Jr: Assessing
the Term Structure of Expected
Inflation Using Treasury Inflation-
Protected Securities Robert J. Cuomo: Impact of Macro Shocks
and Utility Restructuring on Energy Markets Richard B. Berner: Benefits from Eliminating
the Double-Taxation of Dividends Book Reviews
|
The Use of Economic Analysis to Affect Public Economic Policy
The Case of the Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee
by George G. Kaufman
George
Kaufman is professor of business administration at Loyola University,
Chicago, where he was twice named outstanding faculty member. He is co-chair
of the Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee, which he helped found in
1986. He is a prolific writer, focusing on domestic and international
bank regulatory and supervisory issues and deposit insurance. He is executive
director of the Financial Economists Roundtable and serves on the editorial
boards of banking and economic publications. He received his BA from Oberlin,
his MA from the University of Michigan, and his Ph.D. from the University
of Iowa.
Presented at the NABE annual meeting on September 30, 2002 in Washington,
D.C. in acceptance of the Adam Smith Award.
Promotion of sound economic policy is frustrating, not so much because
policy-makers do not understand its value but because its value is realized
over the long run; and policy-makers have short-run perspectives. Crises,
however, give rise to opportunity for good policy; and the banking and
thrift crisis of the 1980s provided the impetus and credibility of the
Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee. The success of the Committee was
due in large part to its proposals for practical, effective remedies.
The Committee has continued to provide a voice that is independent of
industry and regulators in support of a sound and efficient banking financial
system. It has a preference for market-based solutions, and its success
has spawned similar organizations in fifteen other countries, with others
being planned.
Read the article: HTML
| PDF
|